The PFAS Manifesto
Transforming Regulation Into Readiness
I. The Moment: PFAS as Data Infrastructure
The EPA’s revised PFAS rule under TSCA §8(a)(7) isn’t just another environmental regulation. It is a blueprint for the next generation of data governance in public infrastructure.
Every manufacturer or importer that handled PFAS between 2011 and 2022 must now report granular data—chemical identities, production volumes, uses, disposal, and exposure pathways.
This rule creates the largest-ever national dataset on chemical flows, and it’s being refined in real time through collaboration between the EPA and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
That partnership—environmental policy aligning with data governance—is the future model of federal-state coordination.
II. The Meaning: Why This Matters to Us
Every new regulation—PFAS today, AI governance tomorrow—is an information pipeline.
When properly captured, structured, and governed, that pipeline becomes the fuel for:
- Compliance automation
- Risk modeling
- Infrastructure funding optimization
- Public trust through transparent data
For us, PFAS is not a chemical problem; it is a data readiness opportunity.
It allows us how to treat regulation as structured data—how to normalize, trace, govern, and operationalize it.
III. The Framework: NIDD → Provenance → GRC → Projects
Every dataset, regardless of origin, must pass through our four-stage system:
Raw Submissions (EPA CDX)
↓
NIDD Normalization (common data dictionary)
↓
Provenance (trace and verify data origin)
↓
GRC Monitoring (governance, risk, compliance)
↓
Projects Layer (AI models, permitting, funding)
This flow ensures that regulation → data → action becomes a single continuum.
No project, dashboard, or AI agent should operate outside this loop.
IV. The Expansion: Regulation as a Living Pipeline
We are now formalizing a permanent Regulatory Intelligence R&D Pipeline.
Three Core Pipelines
- AI & Data Governance Regulations — OMB, NIST, ISO 42001
- Environmental & Infrastructure Regulations — EPA, DOE, DOT, FDEP
- PFAS & Chemical Rules — TSCA, CERCLA, SDWA
Each pipeline will feed our NIDD, Provenance, and GRC layers, creating a live national regulatory map that evolves with each federal or state update.
V. The System: GRC as the Guardian Layer
GRC isn’t bureaucracy—it’s the trust layer.
It verifies every incoming data element, measures compliance, and assigns risk.
It is how we turn information into proof and accountability.
Sample GRC Schema (PFAS Context)
| Field | Source | Description | Owner | Risk Level | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rule_id |
OIRA docket | Unique identifier | Data Ops | Medium | New docket issued |
agency |
EPA / OMB | Origin of rule | NIDD | — | — |
status |
Proposed / Final | Lifecycle state | Compliance | High | Status change |
affected_entities |
Utilities / Manufacturers / Local Govs | Target groups | Governance | High | Cross-match |
impact_score |
Derived | Magnitude of impact | GRC | High | > Threshold = Alert |
action_plan |
Internal link to project | Ops | — | Pending | Execution Flag |
This schema transforms regulations into structured, auditable intelligence.
VI. The Mandate: Research & Development
Every rule and dataset is a R&D artifact.
PFAS is our first active test case.
We’ll apply the same logic to AI governance, OMB directives, and infrastructure funding frameworks as we have been discussing and as noted in the last article.
R&D Priorities
- Decode EPA CDX data structure and map to NIDD fields.
- Crosswalk TSCA 8(a)(7) with OMB M-24-10, NIST AI RMF, and FDEP codes.
- Build Regulation Pulse Tracker to monitor EPA–OMB interactions. (GRC)
- Map federal data to local impacts: utilities, stormwater, solid waste, manufacturers. (Discussion on tech and how?)
- Prototype AI ingestion agents to parse and annotate regulatory PDFs. (Reg OS)
VII. The Execution: Asana-Ready Actions
| # | Task | Owner | Deliverable / Output | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PFAS → NIDD → GRC Pipeline Prototype | Data Ops + Eng | Working schema + JSON template | 2 weeks |
| 2 | PFAS Data Schema (v0.1) | Data Ops | Supabase schema + Notion doc | 1 week |
| 3 | Regulation Pulse Tracker MVP | R&D | n8n/Lovable workflow + Slack alerts | 3 weeks |
| 4 | Cross-Agency Mapping Matrix | Compliance + Data Gov | TSCA ↔ OMB ↔ NIST ↔ FDEP table | 3 weeks |
| 5 | Integrate Reg Feed into GRC Dashboard | Eng + GRC | Live “Reg Tracker” tab + impact scores | 4 weeks |
| 6 | GRC Monitoring Schema (v0.2) | GRC Team | JSON/YAML schema + triggers | 2 weeks |
| 7 | PFAS R&D Sprint Deck | Policy R&D | 10-slide summary deck | 2 weeks |
| 8 | AI Ingestion Agent for Reg PDFs | AI Team | PDF parser → NIDD → GRC flags | 4 weeks |
| 9 | PFAS Impact Map for Utilities + Vendors | Program Team | Risk-tier visualization | 3 weeks |
| 10 | Monthly Regulation Intelligence Brief | Comms + R&D | One-page internal digest | Recurring |
Implementation Notes
- Create Asana project “PFAS & Regulatory R&D Pipeline.”
- Add all 10 tasks with subtasks for schema builds, automation, and reporting.
- Conduct first review meeting in two weeks (items 1–3).
VIII. The Vision: Regulation to Readiness
This isn’t about one rule—it’s about creating an operating system for governance.
Each dataset, each regulation, each AI agent feeds a continuous improvement loop:
NIDD → Provenance → GRC → Projects → R&D Feedback.
Endnote
Every new federal or state regulation is now a potential data stream.
Our job is to turn that stream into structure, that structure into accountability, and that accountability into resilience.
This is how we will future-proof governance and incrementally operationalize governance
Most importantly, this is how we are actually going to practice what we preach by saying that "data is infrastructure"